Macbeth
v. Beowulf
When it comes to being a leader there are
many factors that determine how they rule. Just like
how Macbeth
come to power was very different how Beowulf did, because they were under
different circumstances. They also had different
leadership styles. Over all they were both
leaders so no matter what how they are they were
both leaders
They’re
many different type of leaders. There is good and bad in everything. So you
cant
expect
everyone to lead there kingdom the same way. As a prime example Macbeth was a
cold
hearted
ruler. Everything had to be his way or someone died because he ruled with an
iron fist.
Beowulf on
the other hand was more of a righteous and respectable leader. The people
actually
wanted him to rule (in movie) really because of the
way he carried himself.
How great
leaders acquire their power is all up to them and the actions that they take.
Beowulf felt that he had to earn his glory. He
showed the people that he was worthy to be a king
so the people respected him for that. While Macbeth
was once a loyal thane the people had
respect for him. The power overwhelmed him with
greed so he felt that lady Macbeth was right.
So he felt
obligated to listen to the prophecy the three witches told him about. So he
just took his
power by betraying the king to get the power.
No matter how you perceive both of them they
were both leaders. The thing is their overall
leadership
skills are where they differentiate at. It’s kind of ironic considering they
both came
from the same background. Before the both of them
really even had any power they were both
loyal soldiers fighting for their king. Macbeth let
the thought of having so much power consume
him. Beowulf let that same power drive him to just
be the best he could be. That’s why Beowulf
was loved and Macbeth was feared.
These are
some ways that leaders become after having so much power. They mainly act the
way they do because of their ego. Nothing was given
to these leaders which made them want
power and glory even more. Before they were leaders
they were soldiers that were really in the
battlefield. How they handled the obstacles they encountered
shape them into to the rulers they
had become. So that’s how these two leaders are
alike and different.
No comments:
Post a Comment